Thursday, January 22, 2009
Monday, January 19, 2009
Friday, January 9, 2009
He has a lesion on the immigration lobe of his brain
Wants to grossly expand legal immigration when relative unemployment is at a 16 year high and the highest in absolute terms since 1945.
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Ethnocentrist - El Guapo
The ace of ethnocentrists. Never saw an immigration bill he didn't like; wants America to be Mexico Norte
If you don't know what that will be like read Edward Abbey's description of Sonora here.http://szczecin-ultima.blogspot.com/
.jpg)
Monday, January 5, 2009
El Presidente Obama
I will bring you change: socialized medicine, the end to free choice union elections, a fully-pandered cabinet, tax increases, amnesty for illegal aliens, open borders, a doubling of our population, a doubling of pollution at the current rate, and Espanol for all.
Saturday, January 3, 2009
The Knave of Spades
Old Sourpus Reid, another obstructionist except when it comes to amnesty for illegal aliens. Wants to flood the U.S. with more immigrants even though we have many unemployed.
Queen Pelosi
Congressional obstructionist; denied the democratic opportunity to vote on the SAVE bill; wants cheap labor for her vineyards.
The rule changes Speaker Nancy Pelosi is steamrolling through the House of Representatives contradict President-elect Barack Obama’s bipartisan promises, and also fly in the face of Pelosi’s own pledge to “insure the rights” of the minority party.
That’s the view of Wall Street Journal columnist and author John Fund, who documented Friday how Pelosi’s tune has changed in a bid to drown out the voices of Republican minority opposition in Congress.
The recent rule changes engineered by Pelosi, for example, end term limits for committee chairmanships. This is a major reversal of GOP reforms ushered in by the 1994 ”Contract With America.”
Term limits, Fund writes in a commentary titled “Pelosi Turns Back the Clock on House Reform,” helped “inject new ideas and merit into Congress.”
Pelosi’s rule changes partially restore the old Democratic, seniority-based system of chairmanships.
“Can this really be the ‘change’ that voters wanted last November?” Fund asks rhetorically. “Wags are already joking that Democrats are really delivering ‘senility you can believe in.’”
The rule changes passed Tuesday also severely restrict the legislative maneuver called a “motion to recommit” - a century-old maneuver that the minority party uses to send bills that reach the floor back to committees, where they can be endlessly debated.
GOP representatives used the tactic 50 times in the last session, mostly to stave off hidden tax hikes buried in larger bills.
Fund points out that Pelosi’s new rules sharply contradict positions she took before Democrats came to power. In 2004, Fund says, Pelosi rolled out a "Bill of Rights" to protect the interests of the party not in power.
"When we [Democrats] are shut out, they are shutting out the great diversity of America," Pelosi warned at the time. “We want a higher standard."
Just prior to becoming Speaker, Pelosi spoke of "bipartisanship" and her plans "to ensure the rights of the minority." Now that Democrats have consolidated their power, however, things are obviously different.
One of the ironies of Pelosi’s power grab, Fund points out, is that conservative “Blue Dog” Democrats are among the losers under the new rules because they often lack seniority.
Fund quotes Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, who observes: "All those nice pro-life, gun-owning young Democrats recruited to run by Rahm Emanuel will never have any real influence now. They were useful in getting Democrats a majority, but now they'll be in the back of the bus.
The rule changes Speaker Nancy Pelosi is steamrolling through the House of Representatives contradict President-elect Barack Obama’s bipartisan promises, and also fly in the face of Pelosi’s own pledge to “insure the rights” of the minority party.
That’s the view of Wall Street Journal columnist and author John Fund, who documented Friday how Pelosi’s tune has changed in a bid to drown out the voices of Republican minority opposition in Congress.
The recent rule changes engineered by Pelosi, for example, end term limits for committee chairmanships. This is a major reversal of GOP reforms ushered in by the 1994 ”Contract With America.”
Term limits, Fund writes in a commentary titled “Pelosi Turns Back the Clock on House Reform,” helped “inject new ideas and merit into Congress.”
Pelosi’s rule changes partially restore the old Democratic, seniority-based system of chairmanships.
“Can this really be the ‘change’ that voters wanted last November?” Fund asks rhetorically. “Wags are already joking that Democrats are really delivering ‘senility you can believe in.’”
The rule changes passed Tuesday also severely restrict the legislative maneuver called a “motion to recommit” - a century-old maneuver that the minority party uses to send bills that reach the floor back to committees, where they can be endlessly debated.
GOP representatives used the tactic 50 times in the last session, mostly to stave off hidden tax hikes buried in larger bills.
Fund points out that Pelosi’s new rules sharply contradict positions she took before Democrats came to power. In 2004, Fund says, Pelosi rolled out a "Bill of Rights" to protect the interests of the party not in power.
"When we [Democrats] are shut out, they are shutting out the great diversity of America," Pelosi warned at the time. “We want a higher standard."
Just prior to becoming Speaker, Pelosi spoke of "bipartisanship" and her plans "to ensure the rights of the minority." Now that Democrats have consolidated their power, however, things are obviously different.
One of the ironies of Pelosi’s power grab, Fund points out, is that conservative “Blue Dog” Democrats are among the losers under the new rules because they often lack seniority.
Fund quotes Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, who observes: "All those nice pro-life, gun-owning young Democrats recruited to run by Rahm Emanuel will never have any real influence now. They were useful in getting Democrats a majority, but now they'll be in the back of the bus.
El Ex-Presidente Bush
I brought you financial ruin, amnesty proposals, two wars and I'm pretty smug about it!
El Presidente Calderon
I will send you my restless, impoverished masses, my drug dealers and murderers. Such a deal!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)